In
not a distant past, our recognition of the nature’s value and magnitude of our
negative impacts on the built environment have arisen some major sustainable
movements. Over the last twenty years, green building has attracted a major
attention in building industry and has become one of the most important and
progressive trends. This ever growing importance in reaching sustainable
construction can be attributed to the fact that we will no longer have: a
stable and predictable climate, adequate affordable and available energy, water
and other critical resources; or that the natural life-supporting systems on
the planet.
In
today’s world, energy is one of the most valuable assets. Though, energy
efficiency methods are the main principals of different operations within US,
specifically for building construction with consuming 48% of the total energy
and 76% of the nation’s electricity. Considering the high level of water and
material usage by buildings as well as huge amounts of waste, the necessity of
the shift to improve building’s energy efficiency is become more obvious. This
will lead to longer life of the building and reducing energy cost, while the
comfort of occupants is also insured. Efforts to improve a building’s energy
efficiency will extend the life of the building, increase occupant comfort
within the building, and reduce energy costs. These efforts will further enable
sustainable development to bring environmental, social and financial benefits.
The
growing market demand for certified green buildings and the associated need for
ever-evolving benchmarks have brought the main impetus behind a paradigm shift
that is currently underway in how buildings and developments are designed and
built. This real appetite in marketplace has convinced those interested in
going beyond LEED and net zero-architects, engineers and builders. Furthermore,
the achievement of LEED certification for over 10,000 applied projects and around
30,000 registered projects at the present time while some of them are
LEED-Platinum with small first-cost premiums, signaling the need for defining
the next level of high performance buildings. In response, Living Building
Challenge, “a philosophy, advocacy tool and certification program” that
promotes the most advanced measurement of sustainability in achieving higher
levels of sustainability in the built environment, is derived.
The Living
Building Challenge is a certification program for buildings that have been
occupied for a minimum of one year and was originally endorsed by Jason F.
McLennan with subsequent further development that initially launched in 2006 by
the Cascadia Region Green Building Council a Chapter/Affiliate of USGBC to
inspire the creation of true sustainability in the built environment. This
strict technical requirement that covers all buildings at all scales, provides some
substantially higher benchmarks for project teams seeking to move beyond the
levels of the LEED Rating Systems with a performance-based, post-occupancy
evaluation of a project’s efforts comprising maximum efficiency and
sustainability. A more comprehensive set of criteria is being evaluated
compared to other rating systems. Projects striving to meet these criteria need
to employ innovative strategies and systems.
Living Building Challenge
is a combination of seven performance areas (Petals): site, water, energy,
health, materials, equity and beauty, which are further divided into 20
imperatives (shown in figure 5), each focusing on a specific sphere of
influence named “Typologies” including
renovation, landscape or infrastructure, building, and neighborhood. Projects should be aligned to one of these
typologies to identify the needed imperatives.
Two
rules govern the standard:
• All elements
of the Living Building Challenge are required for a building to be certified.
Some of the requirements have temporary exceptions to acknowledge current
market limitations. Exceptions will be modified or removed as the market
changes.
• Living
Building designation is based on measured, rather than modeled or anticipated,
performance. Therefore, buildings must be operational for at least twelve
consecutive months prior to evaluation.
The above rules
can be manifested in five stipulations:
1. The building must generate all
of its own, renewable energy on-site
2. The building must capture and
treat all of its own water
3. The building must use only
non-toxic and sustainable-sourced construction materials
4. The building must be placed on
already-developed sites in order to reduce urban sprawl, and
5. The building must be beautiful
and inspiring to its occupants and others.
The overall goal
of the trend is achieving a better sustainable construction and high-performance
operations in order to decrease resource use, reduce operating costs and
increase general effectiveness. Numerous systems and methods that were
considered “alternative” a few years ago are being incorporated into codes and
standards. Meanwhile, Studies have demonstrated that, on average, sustainable designed and operated buildings use less energy and water, have lower
maintenance costs, and have higher levels of occupant satisfaction than
comparable buildings. However, green building certification in framework of a
third party system does not guarantee that a building will achieve continued
optimum performance. Every building is unique and there is high variability in
performance of a building.
Ref:
Anonymous.
(2006). Cascadia Region Green Building Council Issues "Living Building
Challenge, 9, 13
Eisenberg, D.,
Persram, S., Spataro, K. (2009), Code, Regulatory and Systemic Barriers
Affecting Living Building Projects. The Summit Foundation King County Green
Tools.
International
Living Future Institute, LIVING BUILDING CHALLENGESM 2.1, (2012),
www.livingbuildingchallenge.org
International Living Building Institute
“FAQ.” (2011). URL: https://ilbi.org/about/faq
Krippendorf, J. (2010) New Living
Building Challenge launched, Journal of Commerce, 20, 3
Spataro, K.,
Bjork, M., Masteller, M. (2011). Comparative Analysis of Prescriptive,
Performance-Based, and Outcome-Based Energy Code Systems. Alaska Housing
Finance Corporation.
Wang, N., Flower,
KM., Sullivan, RS. (2012), Green Building Certification System Review, Pacific
Northwest National Laboratory